← All sections
§26

Procurement integration (vendor AI governance)

The largest source of shadow AI: SaaS tools that already exist in the company turning on new AI features overnight.

Required additions to the standard vendor-onboarding process:

  • AI governance questionnaire appended to every vendor security review. Standard fields:
    • Does the product use AI / LLMs / ML? Which models? Hosted where?
    • What customer data does the AI touch?
    • Is customer data used for model training? Opt-out path?
    • Change-notification policy when models or AI behavior is updated?
    • Audit trail provided to the customer for AI-driven actions?
    • Human-in-the-loop controls exposed to the customer?
  • Contractual notification when vendors materially update AI models or AI behavior. "Material" defined explicitly.
  • Risk classification applied to vendor AI features using §10's framework. "Summarize this email" inside Outlook is Low. "Auto-respond to customer tickets" inside Zendesk is High.
  • Annual recertification of vendor AI in production. Quarterly catalog refresh.

The "auto-update problem" — a vendor toggles a new AI feature on Tuesday; by Friday, customer PII flows into a model whose terms Legal has never reviewed. The procurement gate plus the quarterly catalog refresh plus the contractual notification clause prevent it.